The cynisism of Political monopoly

The cynicism of political monopoly

Leaders who's leadership is not under thread.
Who have established a system that will only promote them and sooner or later they will be in power.
A system that only the ones playing by its rules can thrive and by the time they are in position to do change, they want nothing to change anymore, if they ever did, of a system out of which they flourished.
These people do not feel the pressure to create.
Need is creative force and these leaders have no need.
They lead as hobby, a fetish, a position of status that for some has been inherited.
For these leaders it is easy to say 'there is no other way'.
It is easy to say words like 'we must' and 'we have to' and ' necessary', even though the plural is really just a rhetoric tool.
Whatever might be lost by what they decided as ' necessity' is not really lost for them because it was never theirs. It never substantially concerned them and even if it ones did they are glad it doesn't anymore.
At best they feel sympathy.
The 'only way' they offer is merely the only way because they are the only ones in position to provide ways.
The rest, are just subjected to the cynicism of their political monopoly
p