Sunday, July 18, 2010

Reclaiming Democracy

Reclaiming Democracy


There is an old quote that there are no dead ends in democracy, yet the Greek political system appears to be stack in a dead end, sinking in debt and miss management.

The reason is probably because what is going on in Greece and many other places in the world is no democracy. What is happening is a disguised oligarchy, under the skin of the dead democratic republic.

Media, corporations and political gangs have managed to master the system of manufacturing consent.

Very successfully they manage to leave the public with no options than those suited to their interests.

Decreasingly few have a say in what affects increasingly more as voting becomes more and more indirect. The beneficiary of political actions are not the same as the ones paying the cost as their influence in decisions is weakened.

Poles and votes in elections of the past 10 years show an increasing trend of the people’s dislike to the parties in power and the desperation in the rest of the out-dated alternatives. This is clear through opinion and voting poles but also through election results. Increasing amount of people do not vote anymore, as no party seems to reflect their view’s and respond to their needs. Parties are elected not by increasing their votes but by the decrease of their opponent’s votes. The majority of people asked during poles, ‘who they would feel more confident in voting’ they respond that none of the current leaders would be capable of managing the country’s problems and needs. Trust and confidence in public speakers is dropping in an increasing rate as classical obscure and generic statements convince nobody about equality, respect and support to the lower income groups.

The parties of power appear to have no difference in handling the public issues and are relying on foreign consultation that is, as expected biased, to the benefit of the groups that is coming from.

Young people have no ‘podium’ to express ideas and thoughts as the exposure is controlled by the entangled system of media that is closely linked to power parties through money and power relations.

Young people willing to work towards improving the political infastructure will have to rise through a corrupted system and by the time, in a position to do change it is most likely to not want to change the system that made them.

We seem stuck in an obsolete political and economic system based in ideas and needs of the past.

Nevertheless we live in a time where independent means of expression are available. The internet is a mean were the sum of very large and potentially ‘infinite’ subjective ideas can form current objectivity.

‘Pirate bay’ has managed to form a movement through internet and gain a seat in the European parliament.

The current generation that will soon step into power is the generation of the internet. Freedom in transferring knowledge and ideas is possible through the media of internet. Our generation is presented with a great opportunity to form the media and reclaim democratic expression.

Issues can be raised, opinions heard and movements developed to form parties that can potentially be given the power to change rotting systems. Independent forums is the media to reclaim democracy.

p

Monday, July 12, 2010

The quarter life crisis
The social consequences of the economic system in personal development


The quarterlife crisis is a term applied to the period of life immediately following the major changes of adolescence, usually ranging from the early twenties to the early thirties. The term is named by analogy with mid-life crisis.




The first book to identify this phenomenon was Quarterlife Crisis, the Unique Challenges of Life in your Twenties (Tarcher, 2001), coauthored by Abby Wilner and Alexandra Robbins, while the first to offer practical solutions - based on peer research - was Damian Barr's Get It Together: A Guide to Surviving Your Quarterlife Crisis (Hodder, 2004&2005). An early version of the phenomenon was posited by Erik H. Erikson although the current manifestation, as Wilner, Robbins and Barr argue, is different.



Contents [hide]

1 Emotional aspects

2 Financial and professional aspects

3 Other theories

4 See also

5 References

6 Further reading

7 External links



[edit] Emotional aspects

This section does not cite any references or sources.

Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2009)





Kazimir Malevich's impressionist Unemployed Girl (1904)Characteristics of quarter-life crisis may include:[citation needed]



realizing that the pursuits of one's peers are useless

confronting their own mortality

watching time slowly take its toll on their parents, only to realize they are next

insecurity regarding the fact that their actions are meaningless

insecurity concerning ability to love themselves, let alone another person

insecurity regarding present accomplishments

re-evaluation of close interpersonal relationships

lack of friendships or romantic relationships, sexual frustration, and involuntary celibacy

disappointment with one's job

nostalgia for university, college, high school or elementary school life

tendency to hold stronger opinions

boredom with social interactions

loss of closeness to high school and college friends

financially-rooted stress (overwhelming college loans, unanticipatedly high cost of living, etc.)

loneliness, depression and suicidal tendencies

desire to have children

a sense that everyone is, somehow, doing better than you

frustration with social skills

These unsettling emotions and insecurities are not uncommon at this age, nor at any age in adult life. In the context of the quarter-life crisis, however, they occur shortly after a young person – usually an educated professional, in this context – enters the "real world".[1] After entering adult life and coming to terms with its responsibilities, some individuals find themselves experiencing career stagnation or extreme insecurity. The individual often realizes the real world is tougher, more competitive and less forgiving than they imagined. Furthermore, the qualifications they have spent so much time and money earning are not likely to prepare them for this disillusionment.



A related problem is simply that many college graduates do not achieve a desirable standard of living after graduation. They often end up living in low-income apartments with roommates instead of having an income high enough to support themselves. Substandard living conditions, combined with menial or repetitive work at their jobs create a great amount of frustration, anxiety and anger. Nobody wants to admit to feeling like a 'loser'; this secrecy may intensify the problem.



As the emotional ups-and-downs of adolescence and college life subside, many affected by quarter-life crisis experience a "graying" of emotion. While emotional interactions may be intense in a high school or college environment – where everyone is roughly the same age and hormones are highly active – these interactions become subtler and more private in adult life[citation needed].



Furthermore, a factor contributing to quarter-life crisis may be the difficulty in adapting to a workplace environment. In college, professors' expectations are clearly given and students receive frequent feedback on their performance in their courses. One progresses from year to year in the education system. In contrast, within a workplace environment, one may be, for some time, completely unaware of a boss's displeasure with one's performance, or of one's colleagues' dislike of one's personality. One does not automatically make progress. Office politics require interpersonal skills that are largely unnecessary for success in an educational setting.



[edit] Financial and professional aspects

This section needs additional citations for verification.

Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2009)





Graduation often marks the end of a student's academic career.A primary cause of the stress associated with the "quarter-life crisis" is financial in nature; most professions have become highly competitive in recent years. Positions of relative security – such as tenured positions at universities and "partner" status at law firms – have dwindled in number. This, combined with excessive downsizing, means that many people will never experience occupational security in their lives, and this is doubly unlikely in young adulthood. Generation X was the first generation to meet this uncertain "New Economy" en masse. There is also the problem of crippling student loans.[citation needed]



Twenty and thirtysomethings are reluctant (or unable) to save for their futures. Only half are saving for a pension and of those half think they’re not paying enough, according to research by pensions provider Standard Life. Their report on the Re-Run Generation suggests that one of the reasons this generation is failing to plan for the future is because they’re so stressed out and anxious in the present (instead many spend time and energy reveling in 80s and 90s nostalgia). Barr was involved in this research.



The era when a professional career meant a life of occupational security and occupational pension – thus allowing an individual to proceed to establish an "inner life" – seems to be coming to an end. Under circumstances virtually effectuating stress disorders, Financial professionals are often expected to spend at least 80 hours per week in the office, and people in the legal, medical, educational, and managerial professions may average more than 60.[2][3] In most cases, these long hours are de facto involuntary, reflecting economic and social insecurity. While these ills plague adults at all ages, their worst victims are ambitious, unestablished young adults.[citation needed]



College graduates are physically and mentally capable of performing many jobs, but lack the "1-2 years of experience" required to get hired and consequently end up doing simple tedious boring jobs for which they are significantly overqualified. In college, some students spend all their time working hard to earn good grades and graduate on time, but do not gain any "real world" experience with which to secure a job.[citation needed]



This catch-22 is tough for college students: one must have a degree to get hired, but cannot get hired without 1–2 years of practical experience. This cycle is infuriating for recent graduates. The few graduates that do land decent jobs after graduation usually have to work 15–20 hours per week at a job during college and, because of this, they may end up missing social events that university life has to offer without implementing adequate time management. These students frequently desire romantic relationships but simply do not have the time in college to gain or sustain them. Thus, they may end up with a job after college but long for a romantic partner and feel as unfulfilled as the graduates who have a partner and no job.[citation needed]



In The Cheating Culture, David Callahan says that these ills of excessive competition and insecurity do not always end once one becomes established – by being awarded tenure or "partner" status – and therefore the "quarter-life crisis" may actually extend beyond young adulthood. Some measure of financial security – which usually requires occupational security – is necessary for psychological development. Some have theorized that insecurity in the "New Economy" will place many in a state of, effectively, perpetual adolescence, and that the rampant and competitive consumerism of the 1990s and 2000s indicates that this is already taking place.[citation needed]



[edit] Other theories

This section does not cite any references or sources.

Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2009)



Erik H. Erikson, who proposed eight crises that humans face during development, also proposed the existence of a life crisis occurring at this age. In his developmental theory, he proposed that human life is divided into eight stages, each with its own conflict that humans must resolve. The conflict he associated with young adulthood is the Intimacy vs. Isolation crisis. According to him, after establishing a personal identity in adolescence, young adults seek to form intense, usually romantic relationships with other people.



The version of the "quarter-life crisis" proposed by Erikson, then, is very different from the one that occurs in popular culture. Indeed, the pop-culture version of the "quarter-life crisis" contains more elements of the crisis Erikson associated with adolescence, Identity vs. Role-confusion, giving credence to the theory that late-20th century life, with its bizarre mix of extreme comfort and insecurity, is then causing people to mature at a slower rate.

wikipedia

Monday, June 28, 2010

RAW GOOGLE DATA!!!

International Herald Tribune  28.6.2010

Public Services seek RAW GOOGLE DATA!!!

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Axe falls upon Eupore

 Axe Falls upon Europe
The gateway to 'necessary' measures is open


If your neighbor's house is on fire your house might be next.
Now the neighbourhood is on fire.
The Greek crisis and the anti public measures has created a precedent.
Now it is easier for governments to pass measures as a 'necessity' increasing retirement limits, cutting pensions and welfare.
Greece Ireland Spain Portugal Hungary France Germany


There can not be hunger during the most productive time of human history. The bottlenecks can be bypassed and should be regulated.



Debt crisis: The EU is waterboarding Greece

The austerity measures forced on to the Greeks are not only unfair, they set a bad precedent for the rest of Europe

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/may/07/debt-crisis-eu-waterboarding-greece


Europe facing strikes over austerity packages

The Telegraph

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/7772565/Europe-facing-strikes-over-austerity-packages.html

 

Axe falls on welfare and family benefits in Germany

http://www.canvasseopinion.com/axe-falls-on-welfare-and-family-benefits/

 

Monday, May 31, 2010

The cynisism of Political monopoly

The cynicism of political monopoly

Leaders who's leadership is not under thread.
Who have established a system that will only promote them and sooner or later they will be in power.
A system that only the ones playing by its rules can thrive and by the time they are in position to do change, they want nothing to change anymore, if they ever did, of a system out of which they flourished.
These people do not feel the pressure to create.
Need is creative force and these leaders have no need.
They lead as hobby, a fetish, a position of status that for some has been inherited.
For these leaders it is easy to say 'there is no other way'.
It is easy to say words like 'we must' and 'we have to' and ' necessary', even though the plural is really just a rhetoric tool.
Whatever might be lost by what they decided as ' necessity' is not really lost for them because it was never theirs. It never substantially concerned them and even if it ones did they are glad it doesn't anymore.
At best they feel sympathy.
The 'only way' they offer is merely the only way because they are the only ones in position to provide ways.
The rest, are just subjected to the cynicism of their political monopoly
p

Monday, May 17, 2010

Mr Pangalos at the University of Oxford Video

Mr Pangalos at the University of Oxford



View Video of the talk
Download Video


Mr Pangalos is admitably an excellent rhetor and experienced politician who is usually very entertaining to listen to (unless affected by the policies he speaks about).
Mr Pangalos spoke in front of an interdisciplinary audience that included some very well known political scientists and world leading economists (that possibly came to listen the strategy of the Greeks to fight the crisis right out of a generals mouth) .
He told us that the Greek government has found the problem knows the solution and it's applying it. Within the next three years the Greek  economic crisis will be history (along with the working and social rights of the Greek people) . Therefore it is now safe for investors to bring their money (so that their investments can become a myth in Greece).
He told us that corrupted citizens initiate a clientele system with politicians that get corrupted (like catching the flu).
He told us that the previous government doubled the debt, made everything worse and cheated by changing the numbers from the statistical service (as opposed to whom?).
He told us that modern Greeks illusion them self's on 'a good day' by thinking they are the direct dissentients of Pericles ( obviously modern politicians aren't).
He told us that in democracies power is given through elections that gave his party the power in agreement with the polls (even if through relative majority). Consequently he says that protests and riots are a fascists action (like splitting the bill at an expensive restaurant even if you were standing outside) .
Nevertheless we were more curious to hear how would mr Papandreou's government would invent and adopt a sustainable system that consequently provides equal opportunities. That; he did not say as well the following, respectively.
Mr Pangalos didn't tell us that the polls he mentioned in Greece for the past few years show an increasing trend of dislike towards the current political system. People that were asked whom they consider more capable of governing, out of the political parties, chose by majority the option of 'nobody'. (Too bad nobody is not running for elections. He would have nailed it!). All the signs of a decomposing political system are visible to everybody but its managers. Scandals, people resentment towards the ongoing 'family-o-cracy', media manipulation and control over exposing political views and most important, immigrating young people. Unfortunately people can only choose to vote out of what  they are presented because that is all they know.
Mr Pangalos didn't tell us how the economic boom that is needed in Greece will occur within the next three years (when the money runs out ). The 'corrupted politicians' by the 'corrupted citizens ' do not appears very promising to provide with infrastructure as they were elected on the basis of clientele relations rather than the merits of their capabilities (or in other words, based on their capability of political clientelism. If they were capable of progress maybe they wouldn't need the clientele relation).
He didn't tell us how it will be possible for small businesses to survive or spring out of Universities bringing innovative products and services without having to spend all their energy in bureaucratic procedures that last months (so that they can actually spend some time on developing their products).
He didn't tell us how the money and time will be managed so that Greek economy can flourish with the 'luxury' of people working for a living and not living to work.
He didn't tell us that the totalitarianistic method of collective responsibility were everybody pays for the mistakes of few, indiscriminately, is unfair. That people in power, media and major contractors would be more responsible than low income families and pensioners. Maybe not all politicians and media and contractors are to blame but still it would be more justified than indiscriminate punishment.
Unfortunately crisis's of these magnitude in the past, did not end well for Greeks.
Domestic issues is a responsibility of the government but the general crisis indicates to EU fundamental flaws of the system that is not to mr Pangalos or mr Papandreou to solve. The structure seems to be build on sand and the waves will keep coming.
Change is now a matter of survival and if not demanded, society is doomed to the cynicism of political monopoly


View Video of the talk
Download Video




the video is on MPG4 codec if you have problems viewing download  VLC player
http://www.videolan.org/vlc/





 

Sunday, May 16, 2010

The games on the 'expense' of Greece

 
        The games on the 'expense' of Greece
EU Parliament

View Video




i

Dangerous Games

The E.U.'s Dangerous Game

The agreement by the European Union and the International Monetary Fund to provide up to $960 billion of support to the Continent’s weaker economies, as well as to financial markets, has appeared to calm investors worldwide, for the moment.
But this does not resolve the underlying problem, even in the short run.
The problem is one of irrational economic policy. The Greek government has reached an agreement with the E.U. authorities (which include the European Commission and the European Central Bank), and the I.M.F. that will make the current economic problems even worse.
This is known to economists, including the ones at the E.U. and I.M.F. who negotiated the agreement. The projections show that if their program “works,” Greece’s debt will rise from 115 percent of gross domestic product today to 149 percent in 2013. This means that in less than three years, and most likely sooner, Greece will be facing the same crisis that it faces today.
Furthermore, the Greek Finance Ministry now projects a decline of 4 percent in G.D.P. this year, down from less than 1 percent last year. However that projection is likely to prove overly optimistic. In other words, the Greek people will go through a lot of suffering, their economy will shrink and their debt burden will grow, and then they will very likely face the same choice of debt rescheduling, restructuring, or default — and/or leaving the Euro.
There are lessons to be learned from this debacle. First, no government should sign an agreement that guarantees an open-ended recession, and leaves it to the world economy to eventually pull them out of it. This process of “internal devaluation” — whereby unemployment is deliberately driven to high levels in order to drive down wages and prices while keeping the nominal exchange rate fixed — is not only unjust, it is unviable. This is even more true for Greece, given its initial debt burden.
The tens of thousands of Greeks in the streets have it right, and the E.U. economists have it wrong. You cannot shrink your way out of recession; you have to grow your way out, as the United States is doing (albeit too slowly).
If the E.U. and the I.M.F. will not offer a growth option to Greece, the country would be better off leaving the Euro and renegotiating its debt.
Argentina tried the “internal devaluation” strategy from mid-1998 to the end of 2001, suffering through a depression that pushed half the country into poverty. It then dropped its peg to the dollar and defaulted on its debt. The economy shrank for just one more quarter and then had a robust recovery, growing 63 percent over the next six years.
(By contrast, the “internal devaluation” process promises not only indefinite recession, but a long, very slow recovery if it “works” — as we can see from the I.M.F.’s projections for Latvia and Estonia. Both of these countries are projected to take 8 or 9 years to reach their pre-recession levels of output.)
The E.U. authorities sent markets crashing last Thursday by saying that they had not discussed using “quantitative easing” (i.e., the creation of money, as the U.S. Federal Reserve has done to the tune of $1.5 trillion in the last couple of years) to help resolve the situation.
E.U. officials also made statements that more deficit reduction is needed by countries that are still in recession or barely recovering. The new agreement reached over the weekend partially reverses these statements, but not enough.
The pundits are quick to blame Greece and the other weaker European economies — Portugal, Italy, Ireland and Spain — for their problems. Although, like most of the world, these countries did have asset bubbles and other excesses during the boom years, they didn’t cause the world recession that sent their deficits skyrocketing.
Most importantly, the real problem now is that the E.U. and the I.M.F. are still offering them the medieval medicine of bleeding the patient. Until that changes, expect a lot more trouble ahead.
Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/13/opinion/13iht-edweisbrot.html

Friday, May 14, 2010

Oxymoron

10 billion Greek Euros to the fund for bank stability

10 δισ. ευρώ στο Ταμείο σταθερότητας των τραπεζών 

 http://www.skai.gr/news/finance/article/143439/10-dis-euro-sto-tameio-statherotitas-ton-tranezon-/

Greek banks had made hyper profits in the past few years out of loans credit cards and illegal charges. When banks were taken to the court on those charges they chose  to keep paying the fines and continue to apply their illegal policy to small clients, ignoring the judicial authority.

Today the government is providing 10 billion euros out of money it doesn't have to support the bank's stability.

Why the boards do not call back the profits of the previous years to support their own business but instead they request from the people to take that role?

Why the banks are treated differently than any other business that belongs to the citizens?

Why the system allows for the banks to play a vital political role?

How the state went from controlling the banks to be depended of them?

Why the banks can claim the free market rules when they are to their benefit and ignore them when they are not?

Perhaps it is time for fundamental changes ...

 

160 Academics about Greek and EU financial crisis


Experts urge higher demand, wages in Greek response

By Klaus Lauer of Reuters
BERLIN - Europe can only tackle its debt and deficit problems if it accompanies the euro rescue package with growth measures including wage rises in Germany, 160 academics said in an open letter on the Greek crisis on Tuesday.
The group of mostly European economists said the $US1 trillion emergency package to stabilise the euro was "necessary but also long overdue and, most importantly, it is not enough on its own".
The letter, an initiative of Philip Arestis of Cambridge and Gustav Adolf Horn of IMK research institute, said Europe's belated policy response to Greece had been "driven by volatile market sentiments, populist politicians and a media that all too often exhibits fundamental ignorance about the issues".
"This has dramatically raised the costs and risks of resolving the crisis," read their letter.
Lamenting that spending cuts imposed on Greece "will only depress incomes, output and employment further, even as interest rates are driven up to crippling levels", the group said it was "profoundly the wrong course for Europe as a whole".
Listing the causes of Greece's fiscal woes as its inability to generate tax revenue, declining competitiveness due to rising labour costs and prices, external shock to the financial sector and high interest rates, the group said all but the first problems had a "strong European dimension and call for European solutions".
"In particular, the loss of competitiveness by Greece ... is the mirror image of an increase in relative competitiveness by others, notably Germany, Austria and the Netherlands," the academics wrote.
Greeks not lazy
Rejecting the media depiction of "lazy" Greeks, arguing they work longer hours than Germans with hourly labour productivity that has risen more than twice as fast as Germany since the euro was introduced in 1999, the economists said at the root of the competitiveness problem was nominal wage and price setting.
Greek nominal unit labour costs have risen by more than 30 per cent since the start of European Monetary Union, the experts argued, while in Germany they rose just eight per cent, creating wage and price divergencies not sustainable within a monetary union.
"Wages and prices in Greece and other countries need to fall in relative terms, but they must increase faster in Germany, whose aggressive wage moderation policies are deflationary, dampen domestic demand, export unemployment and threaten to explode the monetary union," the open letter said.
"This is the only way to re-balance the euro area while avoiding the huge risk of a deflationary spiral," it said.
Warning of the risk of a domino affect, with Portugal most exposed, the academics said lending public money to Greece was "not charity" but "in the vital interest of all Europeans".
So was the need to "resolve the Greek crisis on the basis of rising incomes across the continent".
They called on the European Central Bank to help with fiscal consolidation and re-balancing, which "in the short run ... means committing to maintaining its base rates close to zero".

The Games on the 'expense' of Greek people

                                                           European Hypocrisy
                                            The games on the 'expense' of Greece
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7fnJCmbuPU&feature=player_embedded

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Money as debt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7fnJCmbuPU&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7fnJCmbuPU&feature=player_embedded

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7029185/MOV03538.MP4
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7029185/MOV03538.MP4

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7029185/MOV03538.MP4